Ard had big old ragequit and took it down, along with every other node.

The others won't be coming back though.

You should at least post Akimiski :/

Akimiski doesn't meet my quality standard, it was more an experiment to see how cool a map can look with the most minimal effort.

I have something else in mind for an island map.

Sorry to say, but then I certainly won't put down feedback. It's a shame to waste time commenting when you delete the node any way.

I'm not accepting feedback for Antel anyways, unless there are lighting/geometry/material errors.

"not accepting feedback"

Who else gives any form of constructive criticism on quad? Nobody, just Suicizer.
You just got your 3* back I see, live up to the 3*, Suicizer, if you do have decent feedback that will influence improvements for this map, do post it.
Crying about node deletion is a valid excuse for not providing feedback? If node's aren't meant to be deleted, why is delete option available for non-moderators then?
I suggest make nodes un-deleteable after 1 week of posting to avoid future conflicts.

Boxx, perhaps you should try creating a constructive comment, instead of taking the troll route.

Let me break down 'not accepting feedback'

The majority of quadropolis non-suicizer feedback is 'more x, less x, too much x, why is x here.' That's it. I could care less for feedback like that.

Feedback that suggests rather mass changes that improve the content, this is the feedback I'm looking for. Something like, 'delete that big arch and put a volcano there', or 'one of the buildings is meh detailed, maybe add an x and x to make the wall next to x look better.'. Even 'change the entire theme and atmosphere' of the map, is something I would consider.
This is the type of feedback Suicizer provides, which is useful.
The only small feedback I look for, is like I said, light/geometry/materials errors that need fixed.

Your comment, however, provides nothing useful to the author.

Well, the construction date was added to the map because of it's importance to me :D
There are many easter eggs around the map as well that hint this.

I did not play test this map much, so I figured clipping errors would be present; I was too lazy to search for them myself.

I'm confused as where exactly you're referring to about being blasted at? Some pictures or more detail would be appreciated.

I had a sweet comment typed out... 'till my videocard crashed (after serving me for 7 years). I'm rendering on some integrated Intel-chip on the motherboard for about 20fps with no shaders and 640x480 at small maps. No mapping or gaming for me =(.

That's why this one will be narrowed down a lot. Luckily, I made the screenshots before my videocard died (else they would be blurry as hell).

The doorway above that jumppad could use some clipping to prevent getting stuck there.

The clipping doesn't feel right here. Perhaps some skytextured surfaces would do better or just nothing at all since you're a sitting duck any way when being there.

If you look close just above the highest platform on the screenshot, you'll see some clipping material sticking out of the mountain.

The teleport feels very unfinished compared to the rest of the map.

I was talking about this edge which rather feels unfinished...

You may not be able to enter here, but the engine still thinks you can as there is no clipping material.
By clipping it, the performance (at rendering) of the map would be increased.

This side seems pretty decently clipped. There still seems to be sticking out some clipping material above the teleport, but that's a minimal flaw. It would be overkill to actually trying to fix it.