The reason for this monthly poll is to try another time to implement a category which shows towards other users what kind of feedback is actually preferred on the node. Should a script be more simplified but the author lacks the knowledge? Should a mod be play-tested some more or is the creator stuck within the lighting of his very own map? Instead of adding it into the description (which nearly never happens; especially on nodes made by newcomers or some more experienced crowd), perhaps a tag is more useful.

So share your opinion about the topic right here!

I said Other, because what I want depends on the map. generally, I'll take any feedback I can get, but sometimes I want feedback about an idea presented in the map and maybe not so much the gameplay, or I know there's a couple issues with a part of the map and don't really want people only focusing on that one most-obvious problem.

I've got better at it over time, but with specific advice I find people will suggest that I change what started out as the core design idea for my map/building/project. (this applies to more than just Quadropolis) It's hard to change your original idea, even if it doesn't really fit anymore. It's valuable advice, but if it's one of the only things suggested, the user might just not change anything and abandon the map thinking it's terrible.

Like the short-lived "user skill" option, I don't think this needs to be a category for submitting nodes.

If someone doesn't want feedback, they shouldn't use this website at all. A file sharing website such as mediafire or even Dropbox would more suit their needs. Therefore, I don't think we should give people the option of not getting feedback. That's just a waste of Quadropolis' resources.

If someone wants to specify the feedback they want, that's their issue. The commenters should try to follow any instruction given by the creator as far as giving feedback goes.